HomeNewsSportsMoreWeatherAnnouncementsClassifiedsMy Trib.ComMy CityJobsHomesCars
Advanced Search
 

Feds decide against wolverine listing


Story Tools

Print this story

E-mail this story

Rate this story

Text Size

Share This Story:
del.icio.usdiggNewsVine




trib.popular


It's unclear what type of impact the federal government's decision not to list the wolverine on the Endangered Species List will have in Wyoming, a research biologist who studies the animal said Tuesday.

The wolverine is a scavenger that is found in the highest elevations of Wyoming's Rocky Mountains, including the Gros Ventre and Absaroka Mountains. It is also found in parts of Alaska and Canada and in the midwestern United States.

The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service released a statement Monday saying the animal did not warrant protection as a threatened or endangered species.

The wolverine is a member of the weasel family, according to the Fish and Wildlife Service, and can weigh between 17 and 40 pounds. They are found, according to the Fish and Wildlife Service, in boreal forests, tundra and mountainous regions, often above the timber line.

"After reviewing the best available scientific and commercial information, the Service has determined that the wolverine population in the contiguous United States is not discrete, because it is not separated from wolverine populations in Canada, and is likely dependent on them to some degree for maintaining genetic diversity," the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service wrote in a statement.

The decision against federal protection was panned by the Washington, D.C.-based Defenders of Wildlife, which filed a lawsuit in 2006 asking for a review of an earlier petition that rejected endangered species protection for the animal.

David Gaillard, a Bozeman, Mont.-based Rocky Mountain representative for the Defenders of Wildlife, questioned the federal government's decision not to list the animal partly on the grounds that it is found in contiguous parts of Alaska and Canada.

"If we took the same tack with bald eagles or grizzlies, we'd never have gotten them on the Endangered Species List," Gaillard said in an interview Monday.

Gaillard said the organization may yet try to challenge the federal government again on its decision.

"We're going to do whatever we can," he said.

Jason Wilmott, a researcher with the Northern Rockies Conservation Cooperative in Jackson, said the oft-misunderstood wolverine presents a paradox for researchers and the federal government alike.

It's possible it hasn't been listed because there's so little research on the animal, he said, and therefore, federal agencies don't have enough information to act.

Wilmott said he doesn't necessarily advocate for or against a listing of the animal. He said there about 20 known wolverines in Wyoming, but there could be more. A listing of the animal could have helped, from a research standpoint, in delineating its distribution in Wyoming and in other parts of the United States.


Previous   Next
Cody shop sculpts bronze   WMC wants federal court to stop lawsuit

Article Rating

Current Rating: 2.5 of 2 votes!Rate File:

Reader Comments

There are 4 comment(s)

Comments to this story.

Doc wrote on Mar 11, 2008 4:22 AM:

" I wonder if they hired the same people to count the wolverines as they did to count the rabbits in Yellowstone? "

oldtimer wrote on Mar 11, 2008 5:50 AM:

" It sounds like maybe the idea of listing is to start making money with research grants. "

James wrote on Mar 11, 2008 10:44 AM:

" "Wilmott said he doesn't necessarily advocate for or against a listing of the animal..."

Come on, man! When will you scientists speak up? After you weigh and measure the corpse of the last wolverine in Wyo? Scientists NEED to be advocates if we ever hope to leave something for our great-grandkids! "

LGordon wrote on Mar 11, 2008 1:26 PM:

" Could be more than 20? What did the Wolverine used to number? Alot more than that.

The wolverine obviously deserves more thought on whether to list it or not.

Doc: It was only one researcher who thought the jackrabbit was gone from Yellowstone. He has since retracted his statement, but says that his main point still stands - a reduction in the number of jackrabbits has caused carnivores to seek out other prey.

"

Submit a Comment

We encourage your feedback and dialog, all comments will be reviewed by our Web staff before appearing on the Web site.
(optional)
   
Please note: We provide our story commenting feature in order to solicit feedback, debate and discussion on topics of local interest. Please keep in mind that civility is a necessary component of productive conversation. All blatantly inflammatory or otherwise inappropriate comments (i.e. vulgarity, marketing, etc.) are subject to rejection and/or removal. Comments will appear if and when they are approved. Thanks for reading, and thanks for participating.