BILLINGS, Mont. -- DNA testing points to elk as the most likely source of a recent livestock disease infection near Yellowstone National Park, according to a federal report.
Brucellosis is a bacterial disease that causes cows to prematurely abort their young.
Efforts to guard against its transmission -- largely through periodic slaughters of Yellowstone bison -- have proven ineffective: Seven cases have been confirmed in recent years in Montana, Idaho and Wyoming.
The disease has been eradicated elsewhere in the country.
Thursday's report from the National Veterinary Services Laboratory in Ames, Iowa, said the brucellosis strain found in May in a cow in Pray, Mont., "appears to be similar to strains recovered from bison and elk."
The cow had no contact with bison, according to state officials. The report was released by Montana State Veterinarian Marty Zaluski and laboratory officials could not be reached immediately for comment.
"This is the smoking gun we were looking for," Zaluski said. "We're not really happy to attribute this to any one species or another, but it does give us direction as far as where we need to conduct the risk mitigation."
The role of elk in spreading brucellosis to cattle has raised tensions between livestock producers and sporting groups worried over the potential for reductions in herd sizes. It has also fueled an interstate argument over Wyoming's use of artificial elk feedgrounds, which concentrates the animals in small areas and allows the disease to circulate within herds.
In Montana, state wildlife officials have started laying the groundwork for expanded wildlife disease testing and more public hunting, to cut down elk numbers and keep them out of areas with cattle. Those efforts could start as soon as this fall.
Last week, Montana Fish, Wildlife and Parks Commissioners doubled the quota for a possible special management hunting season around Yellowstone, to 2,000 elk.
That number represents the ceiling of any hunt that might be adopted, said Pat Flowers, Fish Wildlife and Parks regional supervisor for the Yellowstone area.
Flowers said he accepted the federal findings on elk "at face value," but added that his agency will seek its own analysis to confirm the report.
"If this proves to be true, we need to look at how do we either change population numbers or change how elk are distributed on the landscape," Flowers said.
Reader Comments
Comments to this story.
earthling wrote on Jul 25, 2008 5:54 AM:
gimpy wrote on Jul 25, 2008 10:18 AM:
you said it! It might just be that wolves are spreading the disease as they are causing elk to redistribute throughout the GYE. I don't see how wolves are removing Brucellosis from the GYE. Could you enlighten us?
Coincidental that all three states which have wolves have also lost their Brucellosis free status?
As we further reduce elk numbers and depopulate infected cattle herds, it would seem as though there may be more truth to this conspiracy than you think. "
earthling wrote on Jul 25, 2008 5:01 PM:
Lee wrote on Jul 25, 2008 5:17 PM:
gimpy wrote on Jul 25, 2008 8:00 PM:
How are wolves removing Brucellosis from the GYE?
I don't know what crack you've been smoking or whose tail-pipe you've been sniffing but wolves have been shown to spread disease. Perhaps you should be the one doing the research. "
Joe wrote on Jul 26, 2008 8:33 AM:
The theory is that free-ranging elk have lower infection rates than feedground elk. Wyoming's feedgrounds are an ongoing petri dish for all wildlife disesease and they ensure the continual existence of brucellois in Yellowstone Ungulates, since the Southern Herd migrates south to the feelines in winter. Do you know how brucellosis spreads? By grazing near an aborted fetus...free range wintering ungulates are much less likely to have this occur than theri semi-domesticated brethern artifically concetrated on feedlines. "
Mustenyo wrote on Jul 26, 2008 12:16 PM:
solarguy wrote on Jul 26, 2008 2:46 PM:
Wyoelkhunter wrote on Jul 30, 2008 7:11 AM:
If the cattle industry was so concerned about elk and brucellosus they would pull the relatively few cattle back from the public lands and create a buffer. They would rather sacrifice the greatest elk herd in North America than give up one acre of grazing land. Makes it downright difficult for me to be concerned about their problems. This kind of bull headedness does nothing for the cattle interests. "
jerry wrote on Jul 30, 2008 8:38 AM:
Gimpy, sounds like you need help in understanding how wolves are helping remove the disease from YNP. Try reading and understanding Earthlings logic/satire - opening ones mind to new ideas can prove to be truly enlightening.
Next thing you know, sportsmen, the ranchers will turn on you and demand that all the elk be slaughtered. They will not tolerate this egregious/heinous and surreptitious attack on their livlihood. "
earthling wrote on Jul 30, 2008 10:23 AM:
Submit a Comment