HomeNewsSportsMoreWeatherAnnouncementsClassifiedsMy Trib.ComMy CityJobsHomesCars
Advanced Search
 

Rolle: 'I believe in the death penalty'


Story Tools

Print this story

E-mail this story

Rate this story

Text Size

Share This Story:
del.icio.usdiggNewsVine




trib.popular


"Remember Nov. 3, and remember what Jennifer got."

Those were Donald Rolle's closing instructions to the jury that could decide today whether he lives or dies.

"The law says that the death penalty is appropriate in this case," Rolle said Monday afternoon, during a 9-minute statement that capped the 16th day of his capital murder trial. "I believe in the death penalty."

Rolle, 47, didn't directly ask jurors to either impose the death penalty or spare his life. Nor did he apologize to the family of Jennifer Randel, the Casper woman he kidnapped and murdered on Nov. 3.

He did say Randel's killing "shattered people's worlds" and he believed in "an eye for an eye."

"I'm guilty," he said, looking toward the jury from the witness box. "You found me guilty. Now it's time for responsibility, and it's time to pay the piper."

The statement came at the end of an emotional day of testimony that included his siblings begging for his life and recounting incidents of child abuse they said came at their mother's hands.

Jurors are expected to begin deliberating today whether Rolle should receive the death penalty, or life behind bars. The same jury convicted Rolle last week of beating Randel to death in a brutal attack prosecutors say lasted hours.

Randel and Rolle had an on-again, off-again relationship, and on Nov. 3, they went on a date to an Evansville bar. It abruptly ended when Rolle attacked a man he suspected of having an affair with Randel.

Her body was found the next day in his truck, along a remote dirt road west of Casper.

During the first part of the trial, Rolle took the stand and told jurors he slammed Randel's head into his truck's dashboard and kicked her, but he that did so only after she came at him with a knife. Several elements of the story were contradicted by evidence offered by prosecutor Michael Blonigen, who said Rolle beat, stabbed and strangled Randel.

In Monday's statement to jurors, Rolle turned again to the night of Randel's death.

"As bad as that night was for me ... it was worse for the people out there," he said, referring to his and Randel's families.

Rolle dismissed much of the evidence and witnesses his attorneys have offered during the sentencing phase of the trial, including a witness who suggested Rolle would be a low risk to commit serious prison violence.

"All of this testimony that we have heard, with the exception of my family, is a distraction," he said.

Rolle also noted that jurors didn't get to hear from Randel's family during the sentencing phase.

"It shattered their lives," he said.

Before finishing, Rolle referenced a statement his attorney made during closing arguments. Vaughn Neubauer had asked jurors not to convict Rolle of murder because they were angry with him.

"Right now you are mad at Donald Rolle," the defendant told the jury. "You should be mad at Donald Rolle. If you are not mad at Donald Rolle, you will diminish what I though of the jury."

The trial will resume today with closing statements from both sides. The jury of eight men and four women will then begin deliberations.

Reach crime reporter Joshua Wolfson at (307) 266-0582 or at josh.wolfson@trib.com.

Trial Tracker

Last we knew: Defense attorneys continued to present evidence they hope will convince jurors to spare Donald Rolle's life.

The latest: On Monday, Rolle told jurors he believed in the death penalty and instructed them to do what happened to Jennifer Randel on the night of her death.

What's next: The jury, which convicted Rolle of murder last week, should begin deliberating today about his sentence.

On the Web

Visit www.trib.com/randel for daily updates on the murder trial and more information on the Jennifer Randel case.








Previous   Next
County mulls regional juvenile center   Rolle's son begs for father's life

Article Rating

Current Rating: 0 of 0 votes!Rate File:

Reader Comments

There are 14 comment(s)

Comments to this story.

Mike in Virginia wrote on Sep 30, 2008 7:46 AM:

" Execute him. "

Amy wrote on Sep 30, 2008 9:13 AM:

" He's asking for death, it's an easy way out for him. It seems like he does not want to deal with the horrible acts he's committed. Personally I think he should spend the rest of his life behind bars, rotting in a cell. "

Renee wrote on Sep 30, 2008 9:21 AM:

" I grew up with the
Rolle kids. They were not treated well by their mother. She neglected those kids terribly. I don't know about the tongue burning or the cellar...but I do know that Debbie was the mother...cooking, cleaning, doing laundry, making sure that all of the kids were dressed decent for school. The kids were expected to help their step dad do all of the janitorial work before they could go home.

My heart goes out to Debbie...she has had a tough life trying to take care of all of the kids and be a kid too. I know she is feeling responsible for what happened becaused Don...was essentially Debbie's son. The person that should be on trial aswell as Don is his natural mother. My heart goes out to all of them.

I think that if it were my brother in this same situation...I would try to ask the jury to spare hisw life...but then is life in prison without parole any kind of life either?

The suffering for the family that lost their daughter, sister, and ...most importantly... their mother... I feel my deepest of sympathy for. It has to be the ultimate of tragedy that your family has had to endure.

I guess the jury will decide what the best verdict will be.

Debbie if you need to have a friend...I am here for you. "

mark wrote on Sep 30, 2008 9:53 AM:

" This dirt bag just wants an easy way out. He knows that at his execution, he will simply nod off to sleep and it will all be over. I think he should spend several years in the general prison population, and if he survives that, then put him to death. Simply giving him the shot now does nothing for the suffering he inflicted on Jennifer and that her family will endure for the rest of their lives. "

Angie wrote on Sep 30, 2008 11:01 AM:

" This is a sad tragedy and my heart goes out to all involved. Childhood abuse is no "Get out of free card". If the mother abused her children, it's a sad thing that noone stepped up and put a stop to it. That is a shame on the system. We all must realize that when the Rolle children were younger, child abuse went unpunished a lot of the time and people turned thier heads not wanting involved. I believe the Rolle childrens account of thier childhood and say as another human being in this society and world, I am sorry.
This does not excuse what Mr Rolle perpetrated on Jennifer Randall. If we are going to have a death penalty to protect society from danger, then I believe Mr Rolle qualifies for it. This is not infering that I believe in it but the people of our state has chosen it and Mr Rolle has chosen to live here and commit this crime here.
We all need to stop reacting from our gut and realize that this is not a topic to blow off steam about, but something we need to deal with before it happens. Please realize that if children go unprotected that we are putting everyone at risk..
As I stated earlier, abuse is not a get out of jail free card", as we do have choices. Child abuse should be a "Go directly to jail ticket" "

Christinaj wrote on Sep 30, 2008 11:09 AM:

" I don't want to pay for this woman beater to sit somewhere, get fed, take showers, have clothing, heat, and all of the other things they get in prison. Who cares about him wanting an easy way out? Tax payers have supported this man enough.
Also, I know lots of people who had it tough as a kid, I am one of them and it is a very lousy excuse to commit a crime. No matter our up-bringing, we all can still make the choice to do the things we do. I have been through a lot in my life, and you don't see me out there getting drunk and killing people. It is not an excuse, ever!!!! If we started letting people off because they had it rough as a kid, well then we would have to let every criminal on the Earth out of the prisons, because most have it rough in one way or another. And I mean most as in everyone in the world. "

disgusted wrote on Sep 30, 2008 11:20 AM:

" NOW.. he admits guilt... NOW he accepts responsiblity.. AFTER the taxpayers have had to pay for defense attorneys and this poor woman's family has had to go throught his awful trial... Put him in cell, and let him rot. He does not deserve death. "

Horrible crime wrote on Sep 30, 2008 11:21 AM:

" How you were treated as a child to me has nothing but excuses attached. I was abused as a child and I am a good mother. And I would never hurt a fly. You Know right from wrong whether abused neglected only you can choose your path. He knew what he was doing was wrong. He took a life and I believe his should be taken from him. Not giving him what he wants but life behind bars without parole. It is true Ever harmful person to society is someone else’s loved one. BUT so is the innocent. And in this case she did nothing wrong except for falling in love with the person who was soon going to take her life. Horrible Event. "

Steve in MD wrote on Sep 30, 2008 12:24 PM:

" I never thought I'd say this but I actually have some respect for this low-life. He is actually taking accountability for his actions and is prepared to face the consequences. He isn't using his past as an excuse for his actions and neither should anyone else. If he does get the death penalty, and doesn't appeal, then he will have truly atoned for his crime. "

Lisa wrote on Sep 30, 2008 12:39 PM:

" Of course he believes in the death penalty, that's exactly what he gave Jenny. The only reason he is saying all this BS is he knows he will sit on death row for many years. He will have the right to his appeals, 3 hot meals a day, medical and dental and even free education. Life or Death he will have it easier than most people out on the street. "

K.G. wrote on Sep 30, 2008 1:03 PM:

" I don't know how to feel about this whole situation. I knew Jennifer's son quite well and was even up for jury selection in regards to this crime. It's so hard to sit here and say what I think I would rule. I do agree, I was abused both physically, and emotionally as a child by multiple family members and a direct parent, but I would NEVER use it as an excuse to hurt someone. Or my reasoning for doing something awful. You see people that were treated wonderfully as children that still do horrible and immoral things. I do believe in the death penalty. Even if he didn't mean to kill her, he admits to beating her, being completely violent with her, and causing bodily harm to her. Even if Jennifer wasn't a mother or sister, a life was still lost at the hand of another human being, with intent of harm. It's hard for me to understand why humans kill each other for non-survival purposes. In other species, they do kill thier own kind, but for INSTINCTIVE purposes. Territory, fighting for the right to a mate, ETC. I just don't understand the fact the our minds and souls (what pretty much seperate us from other animals) is also what fuels so much anger and fury that leads to instances like this. WOW. "

advocate wrote on Sep 30, 2008 2:30 PM:

" To those who think Rolle is taking accountability for his actions, read again the statement in the article, "As bad as that night was for me....it was worse for the people out there, " he said, referring to his and Randel's families." No mention of the murder victim--just that it was a bad night for HIM. "

KC wrote on Sep 30, 2008 3:23 PM:

" Listen, everyone is entitled to their opinions, even me, but before you spout off a bunch of stuff have the whole story. Don Rolle did not ask for his defense attorneys to provide any kind of mitigation testimony on his behalf. He himself said that all of that was no more than a mean of distracting the jury from their duties. He's not using his childhood as an excuse for what he's done. I would imagine he would agree with all of you on this point.

And yes, he wants the death penalty, or at least seems to, but you tell me......those of you who are native to these northern plains (Wyoming, Montana, the Dakotas) which would be ther greater punishment for you? Would it be a greater punishment to be forever caged, never to roam free again, or to die?

Don Rolle says he's a Christian and believes in the Bible and the Old Testament. In the Old Testament it does say "an eye for an eye and a tooth for a tooth" and it also says a "life for a life." My question is, does that mean we should take his life and give him relief from his guilt and grief that Jen's family will take a lifetime finding, if they ever do, or do we warehouse Don and cage him at the taxpayers expense for all of his remaining days? Tough questions all. "

Deb Rolle wrote on Oct 1, 2008 6:36 PM:

" To an old friend THANK YOU! It would be great to see you again. Re-living my childhood has been heart-renching. I as an adult took up drinking to forget!!! This has been hard for both families. Yes Don made his choices. I know he lived a harder life than he had to. He knew no different. Yes, I do feel responsible! Yes, I do believe deep in my heart Darlene should be on trial instead of him! God Bless to all the small children that were not wanted by thier mothers. God bless the children that didn't become violent or harbor anger from thier childhood because of it. Some are not that lucky. I myself tried to take my life because I felt it would be better if I was a memory and wouldn't be a disappiontment. I feel horrible for the Randall family and I am very very sorry for thier loss. Don has stated he wished he could go back to November and change the outcome of that night. I wish the same. Everyone has the right to mourn and state thier opinion. I have read yours and I have respected your comments please do the same for me. "

Submit a Comment

We encourage your feedback and dialog, all comments will be reviewed by our Web staff before appearing on the Web site.
(optional)
   
Please note: We provide our story commenting feature in order to solicit feedback, debate and discussion on topics of local interest. Please keep in mind that civility is a necessary component of productive conversation. All blatantly inflammatory or otherwise inappropriate comments (i.e. vulgarity, marketing, etc.) are subject to rejection and/or removal. Comments will appear if and when they are approved. Thanks for reading, and thanks for participating.