"Remember Nov. 3, and remember what Jennifer got."
Those were Donald Rolle's closing instructions to the jury that could decide today whether he lives or dies.
"The law says that the death penalty is appropriate in this case," Rolle said Monday afternoon, during a 9-minute statement that capped the 16th day of his capital murder trial. "I believe in the death penalty."
Rolle, 47, didn't directly ask jurors to either impose the death penalty or spare his life. Nor did he apologize to the family of Jennifer Randel, the Casper woman he kidnapped and murdered on Nov. 3.
He did say Randel's killing "shattered people's worlds" and he believed in "an eye for an eye."
"I'm guilty," he said, looking toward the jury from the witness box. "You found me guilty. Now it's time for responsibility, and it's time to pay the piper."
The statement came at the end of an emotional day of testimony that included his siblings begging for his life and recounting incidents of child abuse they said came at their mother's hands.
Jurors are expected to begin deliberating today whether Rolle should receive the death penalty, or life behind bars. The same jury convicted Rolle last week of beating Randel to death in a brutal attack prosecutors say lasted hours.
Randel and Rolle had an on-again, off-again relationship, and on Nov. 3, they went on a date to an Evansville bar. It abruptly ended when Rolle attacked a man he suspected of having an affair with Randel.
Her body was found the next day in his truck, along a remote dirt road west of Casper.
During the first part of the trial, Rolle took the stand and told jurors he slammed Randel's head into his truck's dashboard and kicked her, but he that did so only after she came at him with a knife. Several elements of the story were contradicted by evidence offered by prosecutor Michael Blonigen, who said Rolle beat, stabbed and strangled Randel.
In Monday's statement to jurors, Rolle turned again to the night of Randel's death.
"As bad as that night was for me ... it was worse for the people out there," he said, referring to his and Randel's families.
Rolle dismissed much of the evidence and witnesses his attorneys have offered during the sentencing phase of the trial, including a witness who suggested Rolle would be a low risk to commit serious prison violence.
"All of this testimony that we have heard, with the exception of my family, is a distraction," he said.
Rolle also noted that jurors didn't get to hear from Randel's family during the sentencing phase.
"It shattered their lives," he said.
Before finishing, Rolle referenced a statement his attorney made during closing arguments. Vaughn Neubauer had asked jurors not to convict Rolle of murder because they were angry with him.
"Right now you are mad at Donald Rolle," the defendant told the jury. "You should be mad at Donald Rolle. If you are not mad at Donald Rolle, you will diminish what I though of the jury."
The trial will resume today with closing statements from both sides. The jury of eight men and four women will then begin deliberations.
Reach crime reporter Joshua Wolfson at (307) 266-0582 or at josh.wolfson@trib.com.
Trial Tracker
Last we knew: Defense attorneys continued to present evidence they hope will convince jurors to spare Donald Rolle's life.
The latest: On Monday, Rolle told jurors he believed in the death penalty and instructed them to do what happened to Jennifer Randel on the night of her death.
What's next: The jury, which convicted Rolle of murder last week, should begin deliberating today about his sentence.
On the Web
Visit www.trib.com/randel for daily updates on the murder trial and more information on the Jennifer Randel case.
Reader Comments
Comments to this story.
Mike in Virginia wrote on Sep 30, 2008 7:46 AM:
Amy wrote on Sep 30, 2008 9:13 AM:
Renee wrote on Sep 30, 2008 9:21 AM:
Rolle kids. They were not treated well by their mother. She neglected those kids terribly. I don't know about the tongue burning or the cellar...but I do know that Debbie was the mother...cooking, cleaning, doing laundry, making sure that all of the kids were dressed decent for school. The kids were expected to help their step dad do all of the janitorial work before they could go home.
My heart goes out to Debbie...she has had a tough life trying to take care of all of the kids and be a kid too. I know she is feeling responsible for what happened becaused Don...was essentially Debbie's son. The person that should be on trial aswell as Don is his natural mother. My heart goes out to all of them.
I think that if it were my brother in this same situation...I would try to ask the jury to spare hisw life...but then is life in prison without parole any kind of life either?
The suffering for the family that lost their daughter, sister, and ...most importantly... their mother... I feel my deepest of sympathy for. It has to be the ultimate of tragedy that your family has had to endure.
I guess the jury will decide what the best verdict will be.
Debbie if you need to have a friend...I am here for you. "
mark wrote on Sep 30, 2008 9:53 AM:
Angie wrote on Sep 30, 2008 11:01 AM:
This does not excuse what Mr Rolle perpetrated on Jennifer Randall. If we are going to have a death penalty to protect society from danger, then I believe Mr Rolle qualifies for it. This is not infering that I believe in it but the people of our state has chosen it and Mr Rolle has chosen to live here and commit this crime here.
We all need to stop reacting from our gut and realize that this is not a topic to blow off steam about, but something we need to deal with before it happens. Please realize that if children go unprotected that we are putting everyone at risk..
As I stated earlier, abuse is not a get out of jail free card", as we do have choices. Child abuse should be a "Go directly to jail ticket" "
Christinaj wrote on Sep 30, 2008 11:09 AM:
Also, I know lots of people who had it tough as a kid, I am one of them and it is a very lousy excuse to commit a crime. No matter our up-bringing, we all can still make the choice to do the things we do. I have been through a lot in my life, and you don't see me out there getting drunk and killing people. It is not an excuse, ever!!!! If we started letting people off because they had it rough as a kid, well then we would have to let every criminal on the Earth out of the prisons, because most have it rough in one way or another. And I mean most as in everyone in the world. "
disgusted wrote on Sep 30, 2008 11:20 AM:
Horrible crime wrote on Sep 30, 2008 11:21 AM:
Steve in MD wrote on Sep 30, 2008 12:24 PM:
Lisa wrote on Sep 30, 2008 12:39 PM:
K.G. wrote on Sep 30, 2008 1:03 PM:
advocate wrote on Sep 30, 2008 2:30 PM:
KC wrote on Sep 30, 2008 3:23 PM:
And yes, he wants the death penalty, or at least seems to, but you tell me......those of you who are native to these northern plains (Wyoming, Montana, the Dakotas) which would be ther greater punishment for you? Would it be a greater punishment to be forever caged, never to roam free again, or to die?
Don Rolle says he's a Christian and believes in the Bible and the Old Testament. In the Old Testament it does say "an eye for an eye and a tooth for a tooth" and it also says a "life for a life." My question is, does that mean we should take his life and give him relief from his guilt and grief that Jen's family will take a lifetime finding, if they ever do, or do we warehouse Don and cage him at the taxpayers expense for all of his remaining days? Tough questions all. "
Deb Rolle wrote on Oct 1, 2008 6:36 PM:
Submit a Comment