A proposed noise ordinance is on the "back burner" after scores of motorcyclists flooded the Casper City Council chambers on Tuesday.
The council voted unanimously and to a raucous applause to table the proposed change to a noise ordinance, which means it will not be discussed again unless a council member brings it back.
The proposed change read:
"No person shall operate any motor vehicle in the city in such a manner that the public's attention is drawn to the noise created by the motor vehicle."
Motorcyclists and the council plan to work together to help solve "irresponsible riding" through residential neighborhoods, both groups agreed.
One biker after another spoke before the council to testify about how "loud pipes save lives."
David Brewbaker, a Casper motorcyclist, told the council, "I would rather be heard and be a nuisance in someone's ears than flattened like a pancake due to someone's negligence."
Loud pipes keep drivers aware of bikers and prevent accidents, said Jim Siri, a member of Wyoming Central A.B.A.T.E., a motorcycle advocacy group. Many things distract drivers, and if they aren't paying attention they won't always see motorcyclists, but they may still hear them.
Abuse of a motorcycle on city streets is unacceptable, but motorcyclists also don't want to be unfairly targeted, said Russ Reddick, vice-president of Wyoming State A.B.A.T.E. and co-director of the National Coalition of Motorcyclists in region three.
He wants to educate riders on how to ride respectively and also educate drivers on how to be more aware of motorcyclists.
Some council members ultimately said the proposed ordinance would not be enforceable the way it read.
What the council wanted, said Council member Paul Bertoglio, was for the community to have a discussion about loud bikes riding through town in the middle of the night.
"The riders in Casper got the message that there's a problem out there," Bertoglio said. "What we have accomplished tonight is more than what we would accomplish with words on paper."
Council members said they hope to work with riders and associations like Wyoming State A.B.A.T.E.
"It's up to us to deal with this," Siri shouted back toward the crowd of motorcyclists after the meeting.
To keep the proposed ordinance from coming back to a vote, he said, the groups need to work together.
Contact city reporter Christine Robinson at (307) 266-0639 or christine.robinson@trib.com
Reader Comments
Comments to this story.
Should have passed wrote on Oct 8, 2008 10:53 AM:
Helmut wrote on Oct 8, 2008 11:55 AM:
Online Reader wrote on Oct 8, 2008 12:01 PM:
Almost Deaf wrote on Oct 8, 2008 12:08 PM:
Robin A wrote on Oct 8, 2008 1:38 PM:
Clem wrote on Oct 8, 2008 2:00 PM:
GiantSS wrote on Oct 8, 2008 2:42 PM:
Now on to "Helmut" I prefer not to wear a helmet because it restricts my hearing and visibilty. Wearing a helmet does not make you a safer rider or even a safe rider. Even the top helmet manufacturers will not guarantee their products above 15mph. They can and do save lives, but having been in collisions with and without a helmet, I can tell you from my experience only, that I would have been better off with it on my butt. If you don't buy my arguement that they restrict vision & hearing, it is illegal in Wyoming to wear a safety helmet in an automobile for those very reasons. Back to "Should have passed" On more than one occasion, I have stopped a car from taking my lane while I was in it by.....MAKING THEM HEAR ME!!! Without any actual riding experience of your own to go by, you don't know what you are talking about "
Russ Reddick wrote on Oct 8, 2008 3:43 PM:
now the work begins.
and for you naysayers, the motorcyclist in casper were the ONLY people that spoke in favor of an ordinance amendment, as long as it was fair and unbiased, worded proprely and targeted unlawful behavior. ABATE supplied the city council with the best information on the subject and proved thier point. the city council made a good decision.
the council was not scared by bikers, and there is proof loudpipes save lives, just ask the Oakland police department. helmets only work during an accident and hinder accident avoidance ie/sight and hearing. i'd rather not get into an accident without a helmet, than get into an accident with one on= and your way off subject on that one. if you wanted to have a say in the council's decision you should have been at the council meeting. they are open to the public.
"Get up , Stand Up, Stand up for your Rights. " "
Lee wrote on Oct 8, 2008 3:49 PM:
FedUp wrote on Oct 8, 2008 4:23 PM:
Merry wrote on Oct 8, 2008 6:53 PM:
You have to drive defensively in this town - whether you're on a bike or in a car - people just don't care anymore.
Even if the ordinance would be passed, fear not - the Police wouldn't issue any citations anyway, they can't seem to stop those that speed and run red lights, what makes you think they would take the time to pull over a loud bike? "
get real wrote on Oct 9, 2008 12:39 AM:
Bob wrote on Oct 9, 2008 8:00 AM:
Phil Jones wrote on Oct 9, 2008 10:25 AM:
biker babe 24 wrote on Oct 9, 2008 10:41 AM:
James wrote on Oct 9, 2008 1:12 PM:
How about respecting the peace and privacy of others?
All of us understand necessary loud sounds from construction and so on.
Unnecessary, man made noise created solely to draw attention, needs to be controlled.
If idiots with thump-thump stereos and loud pipe are unable to control their childish impulses, then the law must regulate their behavior to protect the rights of others that don't want to hear these children's attempt to draw attention to themselves. "
OR ABATE wrote on Oct 9, 2008 1:22 PM:
LadyRider wrote on Oct 9, 2008 2:17 PM:
Russ, there is alot of work and getting the awareness out to these people who really don't care or understand what this really is all about. I'm sorry I missed the mtg. "
Hamilton wrote on Oct 9, 2008 4:04 PM:
OtherNoise wrote on Oct 9, 2008 4:19 PM:
hmmm wrote on Oct 9, 2008 4:22 PM:
Useless wrote on Oct 9, 2008 4:37 PM:
Jammorg wrote on Oct 9, 2008 6:00 PM:
LadyRider wrote on Oct 9, 2008 8:38 PM:
And my bike does have a horn, i've had to use it, I've had to flash my brights for people who pull out in front me, flash brake lights to keep people from running into the back of me, people just don't see bikes.
As the article say "David Brewbaker, a Casper motorcyclist, told the council, "I would rather be heard and be a nuisance in someone's ears than flattened like a pancake due to someone's negligence." He speaks for every rider out there.
And the crotch rockets, well, they are just makin us all look bad.
And Hamilton, you can listen to me and you'll know I'm there. Point made. "
TomT wrote on Oct 9, 2008 9:52 PM:
As for the bikers who were at the meeting, if they aren't part of the noise problem themselves, why are they there begging for the council to do nothing about noise? Once again,, the council had an opportunity to fix this and they failed to act. "
Phil Jones wrote on Oct 9, 2008 10:15 PM:
This will include, Motorcycles, ATV's, Cars and diesel pickup's. All of these are the subject of scrutiny.
Plain and Simple folks, the bottom line of the issue here is the noise being generated by irresponsible drivers attempting to show us what they think is "COOL". As I stated in my previous post, I too am a Harley rider and yes I have Loud Pipes. But when I ride I do it with courtesy and respect for the community by NOT reving my engine and hotrodding through town.
If people choose to modify ther vehicle in such a manner as to create loud noise, then they need to be taught that there is a place and a time for that noise. This is not while racing through our city streets. Not only is this a hazzard to fellow drivers as well as an annoyance to the citizens but it is also a distraction to the driver being irresponsible in the respect that that driver is concentrating on the noise they can make and not the people they are affecting in a negative manner.
I for one do not appreciate the noises generated by loud stereo's or exhaust when people come racing through my neighborhood at night and being a public nuscance.
If we are to do somthing as a community to solve this problem , we all need to be level headed and focus on the main issue. Calling names and pointing fingers will never get us anywhere but more angry at eachother.
I am more than willing to help solve this issue in a way that will not comprimise the rights of all of us.
If you have a reasonable idea or some positive insight, I am willing to listen and see what we can come up with for a solution that would be presentable to our City Council and our community.
I can be emailed at pjonesofhog@gmail.com "
GiantSS wrote on Oct 10, 2008 5:21 AM:
Now lets get on to "Get real" "Most riders in Casper are white trash" Wow! I'm not even sure exactly how to respond to that level of ignorance. I don't think I can pull myself down to your level, so I will just not even try. "
Scared Too Many Times wrote on Oct 10, 2008 9:13 AM:
I don't appreciate the folks who like to ride all night and make noise for fun only, either. I like to sleep with the windows open in the summer, and when I am awakened at 2:00 in the morning because someone feels the need to see how much noise he can make, it ticks me off. But the noise I find really hard to deal with is the guy with the subwoofer, kicker, whatever that vebrates my brain in my skull from a block away. I like loud music too, but those things cause me pain and anxiety - AND - it's NOT doing anything for anyone's safety. Let's look at controlling THAT! "
STMT wrote on Oct 10, 2008 9:24 AM:
I was so taken aback by the postings of "get real" and "useless" that I'm at a loss for words. I find it difficult to accept that we have people with that kind of opinion of other human beings or that they have the nerve to write it - well, I guess they do have the protection of a made-up identity and the printed word to hide behind. Talk about WIMPS! You go GiantSS! "
Jack wrote on Oct 10, 2008 10:00 AM:
Rebel wrote on Oct 10, 2008 10:38 AM:
TomT wrote on Oct 10, 2008 11:27 AM:
This thing about the loud bikers justifying their loud vehicles for 'safety' reasons is pretty thin. If vehicles need to be "loud" to be safe, we should remove mufllers off of everything out there. The city council should pass a law that it is illegal to drive a QUIET motorcycle or ATV, and they should require some type of added noisemakers on bicycles and pedestrians.
So they are making the argument that for safety reasons, the smaller the vehicle, the louder it should be. And the city council fell for this.
I say that the city council and the bikers have it backwards: They are asking all us non-bikers to suffer for their noisy hobby.
None of this solves the additional problems of loud crotch rockets, or loud stereos, or noisy "ricer" cars. "
Phil Jones wrote on Oct 10, 2008 12:14 PM:
FedUp wrote on Oct 10, 2008 1:27 PM:
KMAINWY wrote on Oct 11, 2008 10:21 AM:
Ukin wrote on Oct 11, 2008 12:41 PM:
FreedomLover wrote on Oct 11, 2008 12:57 PM:
...after everything was taken into consideration, the department concluded “it was in the best interest of the officers to put more-audible pipes back on,” Kozicki said.
I have seen loud pipes save lives on more than one occasion!
Consider this (and be honest): Have you ever been driving, changing lanes etc, and in an instant there was an obstacle in your way that you missed by a nano second (or maybe you didn't miss it). Whether is was an animal, another vehicle or person?
Have you ever started to make a lane change, thinking it is clear, only to have someone honk their horn or rev their engine and stop you from running into them because they were in your blind spot or you just weren't paying attention?
That is the purpose of loud pipes. There is a need for education and responsibility and not just for riders. Contact your local A.B.A.T.E. and go to a meeting. You will hear a message and education to all members to ride responsible and safe. (this means responsibility not to abuse loud pipes as well as not being reckless).
Maybe those who chose to table this, had more insight to the fact that there does need to be more education rather than taking away a safety device that has saved lives.
And for the comment that all riders are white trash... guess the law enforcement officers that ride bikes and put their lives on the line for you everyday are just white trash too? You do need education! "
RedRider wrote on Oct 11, 2008 1:51 PM:
alot of the comments here are very disturbing.
not all bikes are "loud" and almost all "loud bikes" have epa approved mufflers. so a bike is not being abused on the street, and it does have an epa approved muffler and is still pulled over for being loud....what then????
see where im going with this??
and as far a rideing a motorcycle as a hobby....not me. it is my primary form of transportation.it is my licensed and legal road vehicle. rain, sleet or snow, im rideing my motor cycle in it! sometimes its a bummer, but a mans gotta do what a mans gotta do. and i wouldnt have it any other way! "
get real wrote on Oct 11, 2008 2:45 PM:
Other areas have banned bikes. We should do the same in casper. "
rider wrote on Oct 11, 2008 5:46 PM:
getreal...when you decide to leave town with your buddies the bikers in town will be glad to give you an escort. The white trash reference seems to fit you perfectly.
So you getreal and jack can join together and see if you can add your two IQ's to make enough to order a happy meal with your one consolidated mind. Because based on jacks off based comment he won't be able to run for office due to his lack of IQ. "
TomT wrote on Oct 11, 2008 6:56 PM:
Tommy wrote on Oct 12, 2008 6:17 AM:
05chop wrote on Oct 12, 2008 9:01 AM:
Fan of Russ wrote on Oct 12, 2008 10:47 AM:
Inky wrote on Oct 12, 2008 12:12 PM:
That truism aside, I have seen 15 motorcyclists roar down my street, with the leaders popping wheelies. I frequently hear a motorcycle make the turn from a main drag a few blocks away and accelerate so quickly and loudly that they have to be approaching 70 mph at my house, which is zone for 30 mph. Just around the corner, a young man with a crotch rocket would warm up his engine promptly at 6 a.m., every morning, with ear-splitting Vroooooms. (Haven't heard anything lately, meaning he got a new job, moved or ate a tree.)
Logically, I understand there are responsible, reasonably quite riders, but when someone rips by my house at 2 a.m. full blast, I get angry.
Oh well, young and stupid is a self-correcting situation -- they either wise up and slow down, or wreck. Too bad they often take innocents with them. "
P Jones wrote on Oct 12, 2008 7:28 PM:
It's not just the bikers causing the problem either, It is a wide range of people. "
get real wrote on Oct 12, 2008 10:15 PM:
LadyRider wrote on Oct 13, 2008 3:18 AM:
And by the way, I am not white trash nor are any of my many, many friends who also ride, and their parents who ride, and the business owners & other professionals, and all around great people of this town. Nor do any of us sit at a light and disrespectfully rev up our engines and run 70mph thru neighborhoods at 1am.
People, stop making such broad erroneous generalizations to support your uneducated views. "
TomT wrote on Oct 13, 2008 6:53 AM:
As for the safety argument that is going to come, why in the heck would someone need to make noise while sitting in traffic waiting on the light to change? "
Get OVER it wrote on Oct 13, 2008 10:50 AM:
GiantSS wrote on Oct 13, 2008 2:22 PM:
"Tom T" Why do you assume that a harley rider pops the throttle just to make noise. Do you have a lot of riding experience on one? I do it because when setting at a light, your motor has a tendancy to load up and the plugs start to foul, so you need to do that to clean them out. I'm sure that there ar alot that do it to make some noise. I don't. Sometimes I pop the throttle, sometimes I don't, it depends on how the bike is running. As far as bikers storming the City Council, people such as yourself with an opposing point of view, had the same opportunity to get your people there enmasse. Why didn't you do it? Is it easier to just complain about it in the paper? "
CommonSensical wrote on Oct 13, 2008 4:31 PM:
LadyRider wrote on Oct 13, 2008 4:58 PM:
Furthermore, attend a rally, one right here in Casper next summer and you'll see how wrong you truely are. "
TomT wrote on Oct 13, 2008 8:01 PM:
As for showing up for the meeting, the law was on track to be passed until you guys showed up crying, and the council knuckled under. They caved in to a tiny minority of citizens, and they knew it.
I used to think the bikers were an equal out on the road but you guys obviously put yourselves on a pedestal. You want to pursue your hobby no matter how much it burdens the rest of us, and don't want to give a single inch. You want to play dress up and ride a bike? Fine, no more will I give way to bikers. Next time you look in your mirror at the stop light, i'm going to be the guy that is parked 6" from your rear fender, or the guy who crowds you back when you decide to make your own traffic rules. Like I said earlier, this city ordinance was never about big bikes, but by the way you bully the council then come here and bully us, you no longer get a pass with me. Welcome to the world you created. "
get real wrote on Oct 14, 2008 9:55 AM:
I still say outlaw bikes from the city limits in Casper. "
LadyRider wrote on Oct 14, 2008 10:42 AM:
GiantSS wrote on Oct 14, 2008 10:44 AM:
Veronica wrote on Oct 14, 2008 12:37 PM:
Juan wrote on Oct 14, 2008 2:06 PM:
Dr. Pipes wrote on Oct 14, 2008 4:04 PM:
That is what these loud pipes and other forms of aberant public behavior are saying to all of us.
The pathetic persons causing the public disruptions are to be pittied. "
safety ok right wrote on Oct 14, 2008 7:41 PM:
I guess they need the loud pipes to warn everyone a soused driver of a high speed torpedo is coming. Perhaps the weaving is not avoidance of road obstructions (unless pink elephants count).
Anyone who believes they need loud pipes for safety there is prime home lots for sale in the swamp land of the southern bayous. "
motoboy wrote on Oct 14, 2008 8:32 PM:
TomT wrote on Oct 14, 2008 8:54 PM:
Now, back to your bike. Once again, if you can't make your 25 year old bike run right, get someone to work on it for you. Even the high school kid at Sears can tune a lawnmower so it doesn't run rich.
Most bikers are the decent sort but we can all read your rant above and realize you are one of the problem riders everyone wants to be far from. No wonder bikers get a bad rep. "
GiantSS wrote on Oct 15, 2008 5:17 AM:
rider wrote on Oct 15, 2008 7:22 AM:
After working in emergency services for 30 years and not picking up many motorcycle accidents involving drunk operators as compared to the number of drunk car and truck drivers it appears that sometimes comparisons don't compute.
The number of accidents involving bikers and vehicles is amazing at the times on the police reports we filled in the driver of the "safe" 4 wheel vehicle "didn't see the guy".
So many people in this town and most other places are in a hurry to get somewhere important like Starbucks to get that second cup of joe so if they want to turn into the lane of an oncoming biker so be it. They shouldn't be on the road anyway. After all the cages pay the taxes to build and maintain the road!!!
NOT!!!
And if any of the posters will observe most of the noise makers are riding a crotch rocket that their mom bought them to get them out of the house so they can do wheelies and race each other down the streets.
Bikers who enjoy riding do it to be safe and carefully so as not to injure themselves, their passenger and their bikes. "
Eldon wrote on Oct 15, 2008 10:11 AM:
If the bikers want our respect, then they will have to show some in public to the rest of us that do not enjoy spurious loud noise for it's own sake. "
Made the point wrote on Oct 15, 2008 12:11 PM:
Safety wrote on Oct 15, 2008 12:27 PM:
An example related to the misunderstood unseen biker who always has a designated driver and never at fault. An accident I covered involving bike to auto. Entry to roadway was clear and the auto pulled out. Estimated speed of the bike was in excess of 120 mph in a 35 mph zone with no skid marks period. As this high speed torpedo cut through the frame of the auto on the driver side passenger compartment on impact (whence the estimated speed of the projectile called a bike was computed) the biker was ejected, hit the vehicle and continued on coming to rest in the roadway over 100 feet from impact. We did not ever figure out at which points the impact broke his neck and several other bones along with the massive internal injury. The auto was totaled but what was worse was the biker was dead at the scene and tested at .13 BAT. At 120 mph plus there is absolutely no way to have expected that bike to be seen and all the loud pipes in the world would not have helped. Had the bike hit the driver’s door of the auto there is no doubt in my mind that there would have been two fatalities that DAY and thank the powers that be he had no passenger on that bike. "
Safety wrote on Oct 15, 2008 12:44 PM:
Web site for 2001 Drunk Driving Statistics. read it however i will provide the following from the site.
The highest intoxication rates in fatal crashes in 2001 were recorded for drivers 21-24 years old (33 percent), followed by ages 25-34 (28 percent) and 35-44 (25 percent).(1)
Intoxication rates for drivers in fatal crashes in 2001 were highest for motorcycle operators (29 percent) and lowest for drivers of large trucks (1 percent).(1)
The intoxication rates for drivers of light trucks and passenger car drivers were the same (23 percent).(1)
So Rider I stand by what i said and from involvement in accidents etc. "
Venus wrote on Oct 15, 2008 1:55 PM:
Why not use the horn and flash the highbeams to gain attention?
This is a kids argument using safety as an excuss.
Are all bikers this shallow and superficial?
Good god, how did these dullards pass the drivers' test!
Grow up and get a clue! "
Concerned Adult wrote on Oct 15, 2008 3:26 PM:
GiantSS wrote on Oct 15, 2008 3:45 PM:
GiantSS wrote on Oct 15, 2008 3:59 PM:
rider wrote on Oct 15, 2008 9:33 PM:
The comment about designated drivers involved not just the bikers you like to whine about but included how many of the cowboys and indians who came out of the bars and got in those trucks to drive away without a designated driver. If you don't believe, go sit outside the Beacon like the Mills Police Department does so when the bar closes so they can stop all those designated drivers in the big trucks also.
This isn't the place to compare accident responses. We have both seen bad and good. And saying mine is worse than yours doesn't make any sense at all.
As a badge holder I too have seen a lot of both bad bikers and bad 4 wheelers.
Next time you go to a christmas party or a weekend bbq with other badge holders let me know how many of them leave with their desigated drivers too please. "
LadyRider wrote on Oct 16, 2008 7:13 AM:
You all are confusing the the non-caring disrespectful rider with the screaming _ss crotch rockets that make a ton of noise with the rest of riders, most of which are very respectful, decent people that are enjoying a freedom you non riders DO NOT understand. I'm sorry if you all don't believe that having louder pipes has saved a life more times than you realize. And don't judge and throw alcohol and helmets into the argument to make you look more ignorant, most times that is not an issue. I have NOT EVER sat at a light and intentionally draw attention to myself and revved my engine needlessly. And for all of you who think that we are wanting you to just look at us, maybe you are jealous and have such boring lives that you just don't get it. There ain't nothing shallow about any of us. You all just don't get. I'd like to say to you all why don't you try it, maybe you'd understand, but alot of you putting us down couldn't handle it.
AND, AND, just for the record, again, they teach you in motorcycel safety courses, all of them, that loud pipes saves lives. As one instructor put it, "you may pi** off the little old lady next you, but she knows you are there". So stop judging, stop generalizing all riders as the same and lets all work to solve this. "
GiantSS wrote on Oct 16, 2008 11:39 AM:
LadyRider has it figured out. It is about freedom and freedom only. Somebody brought the issue of bikers fighting helmet laws. The point of that is government is trying to force adults to wear something that should be an individual choice, like smoking or seat belts. It's not the item we are against, but rather a nanny state goverment full of professional hand wringers and do gooders. "
safety wrote on Oct 16, 2008 12:40 PM:
The whine comment is put forth because you know your statement that bikers always have designated drivers over your 30 years in emergency services was false and you were caught in it. Perhaps the truth would make your arguments more palatable. But then again you would have to apply ethics.
I included the web site and included a portion of the stats so don’t (as you say it) whine when caught being less than honest and trying to change the subject. I also stated that it was not always the bike at fault I said sometimes the auto was at fault, sometimes the bike and sometimes both again you apparently did not do what you stated I was at fault with i.e. Reading.
By the way I have ridden bikes since age 17 and am now 57 and my last bike was a Valkyrie. Never needed tricked out pipes, no tickets (I could not ethically give one a ticket if was doing the same thing), and no accidents. I also look for bikes because I ride them and I do know when they are there long before I hear them.
I did not say auto drivers did not drink and drive this blog is about bikes. Your absurd comment about a star is beyond the pale as I remember each incident I saw auto, bike or other. Once you cover someone with a yellow tarp you never forget it and they were all avoidable tragedies regardless of who was at fault.
For you to say it never happens with a bike and they all have designated drivers is also absurd. If anyone in this state auto or bike was driven by a designated driver I would be amazed. No matter what you say loud pipes they are vanity accessories and will not help if you do not follow basic safety common sense rules and obey the law.
If you want to honestly debate the issue fine if you want to trade insults that’s fine. All I know at the time is I do not have to cover another accident (which is hard with a fatality) but I also do not have to notify next of kin which is much harder. "
Brian wrote on Oct 16, 2008 1:43 PM:
Flo wrote on Oct 16, 2008 2:10 PM:
GiantSS wrote on Oct 16, 2008 3:51 PM:
Brian, excellent point. Obviously, Tom has never had any experience with the legal system in this country, or he wouldn't even consider it. If you ever do something that dumb, Tom, figure on it costing you a little over $35K and a year out of your life. Most lawyers that can handle that case will want at leat $10K up front. So you decide how tough you are Tom. Once you are in that court room, it doesn't matter what kind of upstanding citizen you think you are, all you will be at that point is "defendant' "
LadyRider wrote on Oct 16, 2008 3:53 PM:
You have no clue what you are even talking about. Everybody wants to think that bikers are the worst. MY GOD, people, FLO and all the rest, you are passing judgements on people you have no idea who they are. Just because we don't agree, that we have a collective idea that is contrary to what the rest of you thinks, doesn't make us trash. How do we keep coming to that?
I am an older professional business person in this town with a bike worth 25k between my legs and a right to live my incredible life the way I CHOOSE, irregardless of those of you who want to judge everyone without the facts. I have NEVER EVER made a public nuisance of myself nor do I lack in maturity, manners, cerebral activity, cleanliness or any of the other absurd comments you must make to justify your "normal" mind. Funny how we have to attack those whom we know nothing about in order to impose our opinion on those who disagree.
I think the enemy here has become quite clear.
This pi**ing match is over for me. Turn your radio up and roll up your windows. And you better watch out, there are thousands of us LadyRiders out there on big beautiful bikes you wish you had the guts, the security, the money, and the love of life to attempt in your life.
Ride On. Ride Safe. Stand Up. "
Advice wrote on Oct 16, 2008 4:47 PM:
Christinaj wrote on Oct 16, 2008 8:52 PM:
And for all of you running your mouth to Giantss and not believing that he can back up everything he says, well I know him and I can tell you that he can back it all up 110%. He isn't all talk and no action, quite the contrary. This is a blog, besides talk, what else is one supposed to do. "
TomT wrote on Oct 16, 2008 9:23 PM:
I'd say you need to evaluate what kind of biker (GiantSS) it takes who says they will get off their bike and use lethal force on anyone who parks too close behind him at a stoplight. And you consider me the problem? hahahah
The best part of this exchange is that it allows you bikers to show the world exactly what you are, and how you truly behave when you aren't trying to snow job the city council.
Just as I predicted, all I have to do is sit back and watch you lunatics come unwound. "
safety wrote on Oct 17, 2008 6:00 AM:
GiantSS wrote on Oct 17, 2008 10:25 AM:
Tom, you are indeed an idiot. No body said they were going to use lethal force. I want you to crowd a cop car at a light or on the road, and you will find out what happens. Also, I never said diddly about anybody caring about me you dolt. I care about me and that is all I need, you get in my space and I will move you. Simple enough. Being tough has nothing to do with it. It is simply a matter of never backing down if you believe in what you are saying or doing. I would rather die on my feet than live on my knees. I never snivel about my life, because I am the one that has to live it and I take responsibility for all of it, good or bad. I never will and never have gone running to govt, crying, save me save me! I will never claim to be Mr Nice Guy. I am definitley on the fringe of society and I like it there. The real difference between people like you Tom, and people like me, is that we don't stick our noses where they don't belong. I have lived in big cities and small towns and never have I seen a town with so many busy bodies in it. You are all so concerned with other people's lives I don't see how you have time to mind yours. "
KimMH wrote on Oct 17, 2008 10:31 AM:
But, I suspect many of the people who have posted here are not in favor of a nanny state, so I note that the ball is now in the court of bikers. They got the message and I believe we'll see improvements. Give them a chance. "
GiantSS wrote on Oct 17, 2008 11:59 AM:
John Wayne Gacy, Theodore Bundy, Richard Kuklinski. They all looked like "normal" citizens by your standards, yet were some of the worst serial killers in US history. They were upstanding citizens in their communities. I am more suspicious of "normal" people than I am a 1%er. I'm not going to tip toe around and tell you lies so you will feel better and not have your self esteem damaged. You will get my honest opinion regardless of what may come down on me. I don't see much of that with the general public. "
Brian wrote on Oct 17, 2008 12:44 PM:
Sally wrote on Oct 17, 2008 1:40 PM:
Edison wrote on Oct 17, 2008 1:42 PM:
I do not care what the source the unnecessary sounds come from.
All are rude and all should stop. "
TomT wrote on Oct 17, 2008 5:00 PM:
If I choose to drive along the center line and stay 1" within my lane and "crowd" the other lane, it's well within my rights now isn't it? And, if I choose to park within 1" inch of another car in stopped traffic, i'm still within my rights. There is no law against "almost" striking someone in traffic, otherwise they'd be arresting them by the hundreds in the curve at Black Hills Trucking on North Poplar. You need to go read some state statutes before shooting off your mouth about what is or isn't a felony. Like every other person out there, you watched cop shows on t.v. and became and expert!
As for you Giant, you had such a colorful and well composed description of parking your bike and attacking the guy behind you in traffic, it's obvious you have either done this a bunch, or dreamed about it a bunch. Either way, it makes you a road rage candidate of the 1st order. I'm 48 years old, 6'00 208 so i'm probably no match for your pot bellied, balding biker meanness you talk about. Anyhow, this is getting old. You talk tough, and Brian thinks everything is a felony so the fun has worn off of this. Felony felony felony.. "
GiantSS wrote on Oct 18, 2008 9:08 AM:
Sally, I wasn't talking about my looks. There are a number of bloggers here that have made references to the way bikers looks and how normal citizens are disgusted with the way bikers in general look. And yes, I am an arrogant sob. It's not bragging if you can do it "
Christinaj wrote on Oct 19, 2008 12:49 AM:
Vehicle Standards wrote on Oct 19, 2008 9:34 PM:
That is an excellent Idea.
Should be a state standard, or possibly even national. I'd vote for that. "
Brian wrote on Oct 19, 2008 9:50 PM:
GiantSS wrote on Oct 20, 2008 10:01 AM:
Vehicle Standards wrote on Oct 20, 2008 6:55 PM:
Unfortunately because of apparently inconsiderate selfish people who don't care if they trample on the rights of others to live and enjoy their own lives (and their own hobbies), yes, it looks like we need more laws.
In an earlier post you said:
Obviously, you essentially ARE 'sticking' your noses were they don't belong (in the homes of other residents for example) by creating a racket the disturbs them.
You also said:
We are trying to mind our own lives but people who drive through town with ridiculously loud thumping bass or rumbling exhaust won't let us!
People can live dangerously if they want - as long as it does interfere with other peoples rights. For example there are people who climb cliffs, or hand glide, or balloon, or even race cars (at a race track!) that are participating in a hobble/sport and NOT trampling on the rights of others. Sounds like a livable existence. BTW, I myself used to bicycle all across the city, but I can't do that anymore because I don't get enough sleep.
You don't want to be called 'whinny' for your own complaining. thats name calling...anyone can do that you know. doesn't help support your point of view. "
TomT wrote on Oct 20, 2008 8:09 PM:
Vehicle Standards wrote on Oct 21, 2008 11:33 AM:
--------
[More laws!! We must have more laws. Never can have enough laws!!]
Unfortunately because of apparently inconsiderate selfish people who don't care if they trample on the rights of others to live and enjoy their own lives (and their own hobbies), yes, it looks like we need more laws.
In an earlier post you said: [we don't stick our noses where they don't belong.]
Obviously, you essentially ARE 'sticking' your noses were they don't belong (in the homes of other residents for example) by creating a racket the disturbs them.
You also said: [You are all so concerned with other people's lives I don't see how you have time to mind yours. "]
We are trying to mind our own lives but people who drive through town with ridiculously loud thumping bass or rumbling exhaust won't let us!
[Pretty soon we will all be so safe and comfortable that you won't be able to stand living here.]
People can live dangerously if they want - as long as it does interfere with other peoples rights. For example there are people who climb cliffs, or hand glide, or balloon, or even race cars (at a race track!) that are participating in a hobble/sport and NOT trampling on the rights of others. Sounds like a livable existence. BTW, I myself used to bicycle all across the city, but I can't do that anymore because I don't get enough sleep.
[What a bunch of whinny a**sed marsh mellows. "]
You don't want to be called 'whinny' for your own complaining. thats name calling...anyone can do that you know. doesn't help support your point of view. "
Brian wrote on Oct 23, 2008 8:09 AM:
crazy ike wrote on Oct 29, 2008 1:21 PM:
RFBurns-ZeroPointRadio wrote on Nov 23, 2008 6:19 PM:
And there are plenty of others out there that are far louder than they were when driven off the dealer lot. Point here is that it is not necessary to have such a loud exaust system that your causing what is known as "noise pollution". These vehicles are definately doing that, causing excessive noise pollution. Now if I were to run straight pipes on my Camaro and start fireing that up, people would be yelling "muffle it!", so why am I and everyone in my neighborhood having to put up with these loud diesel trucks that spew black soot everytime they romp on the gas peddal making such loud noise and filling up the air with black exaust soot? I would like to see just one, straight off the shelf diesel vehicle from the dealer lot do this. No you wont find any. However you will find them rolling off the lots at custom shops. It is these places that need to be investigated that put these modifications onto vehicles where they not only cause a nusiance, but also violate federal vehicle modification laws.
Is this state and city the only place where it thinks they are immune to laws set down by the federal governemnt yet consider itself a part of the union?
Good thing this is not Texas for if it were, every single excessive loud vehicle, be it truck, car or motorcycle, would be sitting in the state impound and your ass would be in the state pen for violating state and federal laws.
MUFFLE IT OR SHOVEL IT!!!
ps..just for arguments sake, I do intend to let this council person know that they need to revisit this ordinance and enact excessive noise laws, as well as bring this issue up to state legislature. This will apply to excessive exaust noise as well as excessive stereo noise.
It is time to hault the exessive noise here and now! "
Submit a Comment