PINEDALE -- Sometime this century, the three lower Colorado River basin compact states will start getting their water supplied by the planet's oceans.
California, Nevada and Arizona already have plans on the drawing board for more traditional methods of tapping into the ocean's vast water reserves to meet their ever-growing water needs, including the construction of desalination plants and pipelines.
Then there are the seemingly off-the-wall proposals to use giant tanker ships with huge water bladders to sweep across the ocean and drag water back to the West coast. Or using tankers to tow giant, insulation-wrapped icebergs from the Arctic to the coast.
Until that actually happens, though, the state can expect a lot of people will be eyeing the unused water in western Wyoming's Upper Green River Basin in order to quench those thirsty downstream states.
"Sooner or later, the lower basin will have to go to the ocean to get their water ... and those projects show how broadly we continue to think because water is so precious and important in the West," Wyoming State Engineer Pat Tyrrell said.
"Wyoming can't stand by ... we must preserve our developable (water) apportionment until that time," Tyrrell warned during a two-day conference this weekend on water management issues in the Green River Basin sponsored by the Stroock Forum on Wyoming Public Lands and People.
"If Wyoming, Colorado and Utah were to quit using water today ... even a full Colorado River will not satisfy the future needs of Los Angeles, Las Vegas, Phoenix and other cities," said Tyrrell.
"Our job is to keep what we have here, develop what we have here ... and fight them until its economically viable for them to go to the ocean," he said.
The Green River Basin is one of the last remaining areas of Wyoming that has water to develop and the land necessary to build additional dams and reservoirs. Wyoming also has water rights in the Green River that have not been exercised.
But other areas in Wyoming and other states such as Colorado also have their eyes on Green River Basin water.
In 2003, a proposal to move water from the Green River to the North Platte River by pipeline was resurrected and state officials conducted a feasibility study on the proposal.
And in 2006, Colorado entrepreneur Aaron Million proposed piping water from the Green River's Flaming Gorge Reservoir south of the city of Green River to the booming Colorado Front Range, and perhaps to a portion of eastern Wyoming as well.
The 400-mile long pipeline would cost between $2 and $3 billion and would supply enough water for up to 500,000 people a year, according to plans.
Lots of interest
Ben Bracken -- general manager for the Green River, Rock Springs, Sweetwater County Joint Powers Water board and its regional water system that serves around 40,000 customers in southwest Wyoming -- said there's an awful lot of interest in the Upper Green River Basin's water.
"The interest is not going away ... it's the joker in the deck when it comes to the demand on the (Green) river," Bracken told conference participants.
He told participants proposals such as Million's Flaming Gorge project clearly "shows that an excess of water (anywhere) in the West always garners a lot of attention," he said.
"When there's available water in the basin, there is always plenty of interest to develop it," said Bracken. "If we can't do it, there are always other people willing to try."
The Green River is the chief tributary of the Colorado River. The headwaters river begins out of Green River Lakes in northern Sublette County on the western side of the continental divide in the Wind River Mountain Range.
Powerful and wide, the scenic river flows south through the Upper Green River Valley into the Fontenelle Reservoir, then down to the Flaming Gorge Reservoir below the city of Green River in Sweetwater County. into Utah and through Canyonlands National Park, where it joins the Colorado.
Wyoming's consumptive use of Green River Basin water is limited by two Colorado River water compacts and a treaty with Mexico.
State water officials said there is approximately 16.5 million acre-feet of water in the Colorado River Basin allocated to the seven states in the compact, which includes Wyoming, Utah, Nevada, Arizona, New Mexico, California and Colorado.
Under the compact, the three lower basin states are allocated 7.5 million-acre feet of water annually and under the treaty, Mexico is allocated 1.5 million acre-feet of water.
The remaining water -- which averages about 7.5 million acre-feet -- is allocated to the four upper basin states based on a percentage rate. Wyoming receives 14 percent of the remaining water each year for consumptive use, or approximately 1.1 million acre-feet on average years.
But storage in the Colorado River Basin has been generally declining since 1999, Tyrrell said. Lake Powell, for instance, is currently about 145 feet below the full level.
At the same time, there's been an "explosion" in population and use by the three downstream states, said Wyoming State Climatologist Stephen Gray.
"We've seen an incredible population growth in the lower (Colorado) basin, and that means more (water) taps to go around," he said.
"If we extend into the future and look at 50-year population estimates, there is a chance for an additional 10 million people or more to be living in those major cities like San Diego, Las Vegas and Phoenix," he said.
"In fact, Vegas alone could double in population," he said. "Imagine how that's going to put the pressure on a finite resource."
Gov. Dave Freudenthal said the notion that the lower states can take water from Wyoming to support their population explosion continues to be a problem for the state.
"It's perplexing situation ... the allocated water versus (where the most) use is or will be," he said. "The challenge is how do we protect the water we have against the interests of others in the region?"
Southwest Wyoming Bureau reporter Jeff Gearino can be reached at 307-875-5359 or at gearino@tribcsp.com.
Reader Comments
Comments to this story.
Dewd wrote on Nov 17, 2008 8:32 AM:
Obvious Truth wrote on Nov 17, 2008 9:48 AM:
Each parent can be replaced by one child and our tax code must reward families with two or fewer children and punish those with three or more children.
Our thinking and our laws need to reflect today's realities. Currently neither reflects what is actually happening in America and for that matter globally.
Essentially we're out of water now. We have no sustainable extra capacity. This should indicate that more 10,000 unit subdivisions in California are a bad idea people.
We cannot keep growing our national and global population people in a country and on a planet that are not getting any bigger. Isn't that a no brainer? "
Vickers wrote on Nov 17, 2008 10:16 AM:
We cannot do much to increase the fresah water that the weather provides us.
But, we sure can do something about reducing human demand.
Let's not send more water to the southern basin states.
Instead, let's send them condoms and fencing materials for the boarder with Mexico. "
Czolgosz wrote on Nov 17, 2008 12:59 PM:
After you. "
Winston wrote on Nov 17, 2008 1:03 PM:
It comes down to this; do we give up raising and growing our own food in this country and sacrifice wildlife for denser and denser urban living allowing unsustainable growth to continue?
We've over populated and over built and we do not seem to have the guts to face that or try and turn it around. "
Jamie wrote on Nov 17, 2008 2:39 PM:
Platte wrote on Nov 17, 2008 2:47 PM:
Deana wrote on Nov 17, 2008 3:23 PM:
Never too much wrote on Nov 17, 2008 3:58 PM:
Northern Exposure wrote on Nov 17, 2008 4:05 PM:
Simon wrote on Nov 17, 2008 4:14 PM:
All 4 it wrote on Nov 17, 2008 4:51 PM:
Obamas Solution A Miracal wrote on Nov 17, 2008 5:16 PM:
Wyo Boy wrote on Nov 17, 2008 7:42 PM:
Inky wrote on Nov 18, 2008 8:54 AM:
Remember Owen Valley. Better yet, read "Cadillac Desert" and watch the movie "China Town," then buckle up. When tens of millions of thirsty people come knocking, what will little ol' Wyoming do? "
Rounds wrote on Nov 18, 2008 9:19 AM:
profit wrote on Nov 18, 2008 9:27 AM:
LaShauna wrote on Nov 18, 2008 10:55 AM:
To many mouths, no enough glasses of water.
If you cannot increase supply, then you must decrease the demand.
POPULATION CONTROL IS REQUIRED BEFORE WE ARE OUT OF RESOURCES. "
Control on use wrote on Nov 18, 2008 11:09 AM:
Carrier wrote on Nov 18, 2008 12:48 PM:
Everett wrote on Nov 18, 2008 1:46 PM:
Besides if you have two or fewer kids you may be able to put one of them through college and retire yourself before you're dead!
Who said that anyone should have more than two kids in the first place, and how well can you really raise them, giving each child the needed "parenting contact time" to produce a good and productive citizen if you have 3, 6, or 8 kids? "
Lonnie wrote on Nov 18, 2008 3:22 PM:
Some commonsense "curbs" have to start somewhere.
We do not have endless natural resources.
So far our tax codes promote having more kids.
We even reward people that are low income for having more kids using the "earned income credit."
That is wrong thinking and the wrong motivation in this day and age.
Stop jumping to crazy assumptions and propose your idea to help reduce the demand and slow population growth.
All of our quality of life will be impacted directly in time. More importantly, our kids and grand kids quality of life will be reduced by our failure to act to solve this on going and worsening problem.
Do you have any workable ideas, or do you just want to complain about it and watch the train wreck as it unfolds? "
Keller wrote on Nov 18, 2008 3:53 PM:
Barbara wrote on Nov 18, 2008 4:29 PM:
Carrier wrote on Nov 18, 2008 5:24 PM:
We always want to jump to taxing or saying population control is the answer. No, population control EDUCATION can be PART of a workable solution. This has to include tax credits to companies that make desalination much less expensive to do. Incentives for companies to develope new technologies which would include more efficient agriculture for more food production. Instead of paying farmers NOT to produce food, which has been and still is and always will be, idiotic; pay them to produce MORE food.
When I read someone actually infer we take a page from the Chinese population control book, it makes me shudder. Unless I misinterpreted what profit meant.
You're right, Lonnie, there must be workable solutions. Incentives to produce low cost methods to make salt water (which we have in abundance) into fresh (which is soon to be in shortage) are a must. So insted of automatically taxing, how about giving the people with the minds to do it, more of an incentive to produce results. "
Jim wrote on Nov 19, 2008 12:35 AM:
Also some of the best families I have ever met are large farm families. "
Ron wrote on Nov 19, 2008 9:09 AM:
Lonnie wrote on Nov 19, 2008 9:17 AM:
What do you say we do when we physically run out of space for more human dwellings? Places to put our trash and sewage? What do you do when we cannot produce enough food to feed all of the hungry mouths?
None of this will happen tomorrow, or even the day after. But the time is coming, and we must figure out how many people is to many people geographically around the planet.
For now, we must worry about America, but as the economy and resource supply is truly global, we must also be concerned about the rest of the planets ability to support our endless human expansion.
By the way, a good idea can come from anywhere, even our opposition.
I am not some hippie nut. I am a rather ordinary and conservative house wife (yes, we had two children only) that has traveled the world working, and sees the growing problem for what it really is. I care about the grand kids future and I am unwilling to be blind to it for my own comfort and conveniance. "
Claira wrote on Nov 19, 2008 12:23 PM:
Paula wrote on Nov 19, 2008 12:47 PM:
That leaves the choice up to you, just like a consumption tax.
Taxes have long been proven to be very useful in shaping choices and as a tool to enforce social policy.
Look at the current system, it rewards having more and more children. That's wrong headed thinking today.
This is the fairest way to make this change in thinking and behavior. "
outa control wrote on Nov 20, 2008 11:01 AM:
LaVerna wrote on Nov 20, 2008 1:52 PM:
The governments control much more than our breeding habits now, which of their other controls do you wish to roll back in the name of freedom.
And, oh by the way, we all squeal like pigs about our d_mned freedoms, what about our RESPONSIBILITIES?
You cannot have the one with out owning up to the other. "
Petra wrote on Nov 20, 2008 2:02 PM:
To Many wrote on Nov 20, 2008 4:05 PM:
Where are the plans wrote on Nov 20, 2008 4:49 PM:
Denise wrote on Nov 21, 2008 10:42 AM:
Perry wrote on Nov 21, 2008 10:54 AM:
They either over react and spend billions on non-problems, or they wait until no amount of time, money and effort can repair a problem.
I guess we'll see what the Obama administration will do and who they will back in this matter.
Since he is an urban dweller that understands little of the west or rural life I am sure that he will demand that we go without in order for the cities (with their high concentrations of liberal voters) get everything that they want. "
Natally wrote on Nov 21, 2008 11:56 AM:
To Wyo boy wrote on Nov 21, 2008 5:04 PM:
Furthermore I agree no more water for the lower basin. We entered a pact with Nebraska years ago, supplying them with water for 50 years and now we can't get out of it. Our lakes are drained beyond any recreational standard, rivers running very low, and they still ask for more. I say NO lets keep the Green River Basin for ourselves, let the overpopulated morons build distilleries etc for their own use. Not our problem! "
SO wrote on Nov 21, 2008 8:04 PM:
For every child the neolibs murder prior to birth another family would be able to obtain the credit and actually give a life to try to make up for the act of murder that took place. The murderer would have no right to have any future children thus putting a stop to gender selection (a problem the Chinese now have). "
DM wrote on Nov 23, 2008 11:27 AM:
No Brainer wrote on Nov 24, 2008 10:04 AM:
Len wrote on Nov 24, 2008 10:17 AM:
Paris H wrote on Nov 24, 2008 10:44 AM:
Czolgosz wrote on Nov 24, 2008 12:18 PM:
Ever been to Wyoming and looked around? "
Chopping up the land wrote on Nov 24, 2008 1:47 PM:
James wrote on Nov 25, 2008 10:50 AM:
Once we're out of water we'll all ask what they h_ll happened and why didn't anyone think about this. Then we'll all look to the government for a solution. "
Nero wrote on Nov 25, 2008 2:43 PM:
Submit a Comment