HomeNewsSportsMoreWeatherAnnouncementsClassifiedsMy Trib.ComMy CityJobsHomesCars
Advanced Search
 

Wyo Range, Snake River measures advance


Story Tools

Print this story

E-mail this story

Rate this story

Text Size

Share This Story:
del.icio.usdiggNewsVine




trib.popular


WASHINGTON -- In a rare Sunday session, the Senate advanced legislation that would limit further oil and gas leasing in the Wyoming Range and designate 387 miles of rivers and streams in the Snake River drainage as "wild and scenic."

By a 66-12 vote, with only 59 needed to limit debate, lawmakers agreed to clear away procedural hurdles despite partisan wrangling that had threatened pledges by leaders to work cooperatively as the new Obama administration takes office. Senate approval is expected later this week.

Majority Democrats assembled more than enough votes to overcome GOP stalling tactics in an early showdown for the new Congress. Sens. Mike Enzi and John Barrasso, R-Wyo., were among those voting in the majority.

The measure -- actually a collection of about 160 bills -- also would set aside more than 2 million acres in nine states as wilderness.

Supporters of protecting the Wyoming Range, on the state's far-western flank, said they were happy with the vote.

Tom Reed, spokesmen for Sportsmen for the Wyoming Range, said Sunday that the vote was a good sign and a ratification of the hard work supporters had put into protecting the area. Former Sen. Craig Thomas, R-Wyo., had supported protection of the area before his death in 2007.

"The fact that the vote was 66 to 12 bodes well for our chances when it comes to a final vote," Reed said. "I think it's also sort of validation of things that Craig Thomas stood for, which was balance in terms of energy production and hunting and fishing values."

Reed said protecting the Wyoming Range would be a "real validation of the Wyoming way of looking at things: We can pitch in and do more than our fair share of energy production for this country, but we also want to save something for our kids."

Thomas also had supported "wild and scenic" designation for parts of the Snake River and its tributaries in northwest Wyoming, and following his death, Barrasso led the effort in support of that measure as well.

"Senator Barrasso has done a fantastic job guiding this bill through the Senate," said Campaign for the Snake Headwaters Executive Director Tom Patricelli, who traveled to Washington to witness the vote. "This was a critical test for this legislation which is so important for Wyoming's small businesses, our outfitters, our tourism-based economy, and our natural resources."

"Wild and scenic" designation protects water quality and the free-flowing nature of rivers while allowing the continued multiple use of the streams and surrounding lands. Such designations do not affect or restrict water rights, interstate water compacts or private property rights.

Another piece of the major package of legislation would commit the federal government to help states compensate ranchers for livestock lost to wolves, once the animals are removed from Endangered Species Act protection.

Republicans complained that Democrats did not allow amendments on the massive bill, which calls for the largest expansion of wilderness protection in 25 years. But Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., and other Democrats said the bill -- a holdover from last year -- was carefully written and included measures sponsored by both Republicans and Democrats.

In fact, Reid said, about half of the bills in the package were sponsored by Republicans. Most had been considered for more than a year.

"I am happy that after months of delay we will finally be moving forward," Reid said.

The bill's chief opponent, Sen. Tom Coburn, R-Okla., denounced what he called Democratic bullying tactics.

"I am disappointed the Senate majority leader has refused to allow senators the opportunity to improve, amend or eliminate any of the questionable provisions in his omnibus lands bill," Coburn told fellow senators.

"When the American people asked Congress to set a new tone, I don't believe refusing to listen to the concerns of others was what they had in mind," Coburn said. "The American people expect us hold open, civil and thorough debates on costly legislation, not ram through 1,300-page bills when few are watching."

Supporters expressed confidence that the House will approve the package once it clears the Senate, though new U.S. Rep. Cynthia Lummis, R-Wyo., on Friday spoke in opposition to the package of bills. She also said she doesn't support the Wyoming Range and Snake River measures as currently written.


Previous  
Revenue outlook may dim chances for property tax relief  

Article Rating

Current Rating: 0 of 0 votes!Rate File:

Reader Comments

There are 7 comment(s)

Comments to this story.

Roy wrote on Jan 12, 2009 8:14 AM:

" This travesty ignores the unstated and obvious. 160 pieces of legislation, $4 BILLION dollars in pork barrel projects - all heralded as a "fantastic job!"

This article fails to educate or differentiate between the various categories within the Wild & Scenic designations and fails to mention the restrictions on adjacent uses of the land, including landings, picnic areas, trails, roads, etc. Much like the watered-down 'Wilderness' being proposed by this Bill, there is more left unsaid than said in the passage of this Bill.

It's time to elect Congressmen who are willing to stand up to the 'politicians' and demand more accountability and open discussion. Just because your fellow politicians are tossing you some of what you want doesn't mean the rest of the Bill is right or proper. "

GOPPOKE wrote on Jan 12, 2009 10:22 AM:

" Well said Roy. I have hopes that Ms. Lummis can articulate the problems with the bill and I am proud that she is not just going with the flow. This legislation is short sighted, but sounds "Oh so wonderful". "

Phiffer wrote on Jan 12, 2009 1:00 PM:

" I'd think that all of the rich democrats that are moving here in droves would hate this bill. No where will they build their new McMansions? More public land means less land that they can buy up in giant chunks to spend their city earned dollars on build yoga retreats and harmonic chanting sweat lodges. "

Cowboy Joe wrote on Jan 12, 2009 1:32 PM:

" The larger the roadless area, the longer the elk season, enough said. WIlderness is good hunting and fishing, there are millions of acres more suitable for drilliing. "

Aww wrote on Jan 12, 2009 8:42 PM:

" Tough luck Roy and GoPoke - it's going to pass. Go drill somewhere else. Odd that senators from the following western states all (ALL) voted for this, and Lummis (drill baby drill, graze on public lands baby graze) was against it:

Alaska, California, Colorado, Idaho, Montana, New Mexico, Utah, and WYOMING.

Looks like Lummis is another Barbara Cubin - voting for big energy at the expense of Wyoming. "

Roy wrote on Jan 13, 2009 8:07 AM:

" It is unfortunate that 'elk season' is seen as justification for the expansion of roadless areas. Because elk are a transient species, many of the affected areas are closed year-round for the benefit of 2 - 3 months hunting.

Meanwhile, other recreational activities are condensed into smaller areas which results in greater impacts, reduced visitor satisfaction and increased conflicts.

While Wilderness may be good for hunting and fishing for those with the physical and/or financial abilities to access those areas, there already exists a phenomenal amount of good fishing and hunting in remote areas without the need for 'Wilderness' designation.

Two additional points regarding 'roadless.' The Bridger-Teton National Forest already does a great job of reducing travel in many areas on the forest by closing roads and trails just prior to the start of hunting season - generally mid-September. Additionally, a 'roadless' designation solely restricts roads, but not motorized trails for vehicles 50" wide or narrower.

Ultimately at stake is the legacy of Congressional designations. What is good or desired for a management practice today may not be true in 150 years. However, reversal of a Congressional designation of a land management Act is statistically impossible, whereas Agency (State, BLM, NF) plans are revised and updated on a 10 - 20 year cycle.

To paraphrase something I read recently, 'We live in a time when change is so fast that we realize tomorrow what we did today." That is my greatest fear when it comes to many Congressional decisions influenced by partisan or pork barrel politics, as this Omnibus Bill was. "

Wyoelkhunter wrote on Jan 13, 2009 10:50 AM:

" I agree with Cowboy Joe. Adequate roadlessareas are essential to good hunting and fishing.

Roy you are obviously suffering from nature deficit disorder. Yes , elk are transient in heavily roaded and disturbed areas because these areas don't contain the secure cover these animals need.

I am tired of the whining by people of the ATV ilk that are too lazy to walk into roadless areas. I'm 60 years old and I can still manage to get into and enjoy roadless areas. I have friends over 70 that still do so. Yet even after we get there we are often running into illegal atv trails. There is nothing stopping you but your own self motivation.

Once roads are put into these roadless tracts the character of the land is altered forever. I can walk into areas where road travel is allowed and I disturb no one< I interfere with no one. Not so the other way around.

It is getting harder and haarder to find roadless country. The elk and other game are being pushed further and further back from the traveled roads, I have to walk farther and farther to get to them I have to pack them farther and farther once I get one down. I for one am grateful that Senator Barrasso and others have some foresight and are looking out for future generations. "

Submit a Comment

We encourage your feedback and dialog, all comments will be reviewed by our Web staff before appearing on the Web site.
(optional)
   
Please note: We provide our story commenting feature in order to solicit feedback, debate and discussion on topics of local interest. Please keep in mind that civility is a necessary component of productive conversation. All blatantly inflammatory or otherwise inappropriate comments (i.e. vulgarity, marketing, etc.) are subject to rejection and/or removal. Comments will appear if and when they are approved. Thanks for reading, and thanks for participating.